
"A Dystopian Tale"
The writing on the Wall
Agenda 2030, The True Intention
The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, launched during a summit in New York in September 2015, aims to eradicate poverty in all its forms. This ambitious agenda envisions a world where human rights, dignity, justice, and equality are universally respected. The rhetoric of these leaders often masks their true intentions, prioritising conformity over freedom, which could lead to a significant erosion of democratic values and the establishment of a dystopian society. The Agenda 2030 serves as a pivotal framework that connects the various strands of global centralisation across the seven pillars of society, which are currently being implemented worldwide. This trajectory suggests that by 2030, we may witness a culmination reminiscent of a Leninist framework, characterised by the rise of far-right leaders across various countries. The ramifications of such a shift are significant, as communities face the erosion of democratic principles alongside an increase in authoritarian governance. The pressing task is to identify and counteract these developments before they become ingrained in the societal norm.
The UN’s “Pact for the Future,” introduced as a collaborative effort to safeguard humanity, warrants critical examination. Announced during the UN’s Summit of the Future, it prompts skepticism about whether its goals are genuinely altruistic or if they lean towards a technocratic model of global governance. As part of the 79th session of the UN General Assembly, the summit has been in development since 2022, in response to calls for accelerated progress on the Agenda 2030 goals, which include 17 sustainability targets aimed at poverty eradication, education enhancement, and climate change mitigation. While these objectives are commendable, they may also mask a broader agenda that infiltrates daily life. The pervasive influence of Agenda 2030 across various sectors subtly shapes public perception. While the aims of reducing poverty and inequality are laudable, leaders must strike a delicate balance between global aspirations and the immediate needs of their citizens. The Pact for the Future, along with initiatives like the Global Digital Compact, addresses pressing issues such as peace and sustainable development. However, the concept of global governance raises alarms, as many feel detached from decisions made by distant authorities. The commitments in the Pact promote international peace and security, yet achieving these ideals could require resource redistribution that echoes past failures of Leninist ideologies. This pursuit of equality might inadvertently exacerbate disparities, enriching the powerful while leaving the middle class struggling.
As society navigates this technocratic terrain, a pivotal question arises: will individuals succumb to conformity, or can they forge alternative pathways outside the digital framework? While the intentions behind the Pact for the Future may appear benevolent, they necessitate a thorough assessment of their societal impacts. The initiatives that gain traction are often not the ambitious ones aimed at environmental restoration or aiding marginalised communities, but rather the profitable ventures in renewable energy that threaten agricultural land. The ongoing surveillance culture and the paradox of diversity initiatives raise concerns, particularly regarding the UN’s commitment to empowering women while promoting ideologies that may undermine their autonomy such as abortion right.
It is crucial to remain vigilant about the 2030 UN Agenda, as its overarching goal seems to encompass regulation of various life aspects, from travel and dietary choices to personal expression. Collective action is essential in advocating for individual rights, including the freedom to trade, reject unwanted medical interventions, and grow food according to personal beliefs. Staying informed and actively participating in discussions about these developments is vital; individuals must express their concerns in everyday contexts and resist the encroachment on freedoms by a select few. Ultimately, while the UN’s Pact for the Future is positioned as a safeguard for humanity, it raises doubts about its true intentions and the potential consequences of its technocratic governance model.
Project 2025, A Precursor to Agenda 2030
Project 2025 marks a significant shift in the landscape of federal policy in the United States, designed to radically redefine the executive branch’s structure and function. This initiative, crafted by former officials of the Trump administration alongside The Heritage Foundation, aspires to create a conservative framework that directly challenges a myriad of established rights and freedoms. At the heart of this movement lies the comprehensive document titled “Mandate for Leadership,” which outlines a strategic blueprint for reorganising federal agencies to align with conservative ideologies. Among the more controversial proposals is the elimination of abortion access, which could lead to stringent restrictions on reproductive rights, significantly affecting women’s autonomy. Additionally, the initiative promotes harsh immigration policies that threaten the stability of immigrant communities through actions such as mass deportations and family separations.
Furthermore, Project 2025 poses a grave threat to civil liberties, particularly by potentially infringing upon First Amendment rights, with particular focus on journalists and peaceful demonstrators. The agenda extends to undermining democratic processes by restricting voting access and leveraging executive power to criminalise certain aspects of voting, thereby jeopardising fair representation in the political system. In educational settings, the project advocates for censorship, aiming to curtail discussions surrounding race, gender, and systemic oppression, while also threatening federal funding for institutions that dare to engage with these critical topics. The rollback of transgender rights is another alarming facet, as it seeks to utilise federal law to coerce states and institutions into discriminatory practices against transgender individuals, which could have devastating effects on the rights and well-being of trans youth.
In a broader context, Project 2025 can be seen as a strategic manoeuvre that aligns with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030, a framework addressing global crises that require urgent attention. These crises encompass poverty, discrimination, and various climate-related challenges, often misrepresented as natural disasters, alongside escalating border conflicts and political turmoil that are systematically orchestrated. Influential figures in technology and business ensnared into this web, consolidating their power and facilitating societal control in alignment with Agenda 2030. The ongoing geopolitical strife in regions such as Ukraine, the Middle East, and the South China Sea, coupled with initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, unveils a complex strategy aimed at global centralisation. The calculated replacement of political leaders, potentially groomed from a young age, underscores a deliberate governance approach that seeks to impose a dystopian future. These meticulously orchestrated efforts to overhaul governance structures worldwide designed to advance Agenda 2030, ultimately paving the way for a society characterised by unprecedented surveillance and control, where individual freedoms are sacrificed under the guise of the greater good.
Project 2020, A Silent Invasion
In Australia, the covert execution of Project 2020, led by former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, has drawn parallels to the United States’ Project 2025. Morrison, much like his American counterpart Donald Trump, is recognised for his evangelical beliefs, which not only propelled his political ascent but also likely shaped his decision-making and strategies. The initiative, cloaked in secrecy, raised numerous questions as details emerged regarding the motivations behind these similar undertakings in two nations governed by ideologically aligned leaders. Following the 2022 Australian federal election, which resulted in the fall of Morrison’s government, a startling revelation came to light: he had secretly appointed himself to five ministerial positions—Health, Finance, Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, and Home Affairs & Treasury—without informing the public or his cabinet. This unprecedented move allowed him to exert total control over the Australian government’s operations, resulting in significant consequences, including the outsourcing of public service jobs to multinational consulting firms and the proposal of a controversial religious bill. His tenure was characterised by divisive policies, particularly in relation to climate change, where his close ties to fossil fuel industries and his harsh treatment of immigration and asylum seekers, including the establishment of offshore detention centres and notably the 1.8 billion dollars allocated to the shell company Paladin run by the sister of current opposition leader Dutton, were viewed by many as a misuse of funds. Furthermore, Morrison’s approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding vaccine distribution and economic assistance that disproportionately favoured his religious allies, faced severe scrutiny. These actions have faced intense scrutiny surrounding governance, accountability, and the ethical implications of his leadership.
The initiatives of Project 2020 and Project 2025 are not mere coincidences; they represent a calculated strategy to unify the world under a singular, dystopian regime, echoing the principles of the “China Model.” This model incorporates advanced technologies such as digital identification, facial recognition, and a comprehensive social credit system, which have already been adopted in various regions where it is deemed convenient. The forthcoming Agenda 2030 is poised to validate and institutionalise these developments, further entrenching this global initiative and potentially eroding individual freedoms and privacy in the process, ultimately shaping a world that prioritises control and surveillance over individual freedoms.
United Nations’ Agenda 2030 can be seen as the end product of a modern cultural revolution, reminiscent of the strategies employed by Chinese communists during the Chinese Civil War, where ideological fervour and collective mobilisation played pivotal roles in reshaping society. Just as the communists harnessed the power of grassroots movements and propaganda to galvanise support and dismantle existing hierarchies, the UN’s agenda seeks to enforce global cooperation and transformative change through sustainable development goals aimed at addressing inequality and environmental degradation. This parallel suggests that the mechanisms of social transformation echo historical patterns of cultural revolutions, although without military intervention. However, the journey towards this agenda has not been without sacrifice, as evidenced by the ongoing issues of drug trafficking, climate manipulation, proxy conflicts, and familial disintegration, all contributing to the toll we have paid in pursuit of an ultimately dystopian world.
We must call upon our leaders, both in politics and business, to resist the alluring temptations and pressures that threaten our freedom and way of life. It is crucial to remember that those who work diligently will still achieve success, but true leadership means prioritising the welfare of all, not just personal gain. Our leaders have a responsibility to ensure that everyone thrives, as this ultimately enriches their own power and legacy. We owe it to our children and the generations before us who sacrificed so much, many with their lives, for our quality of life to uphold these values. The struggles we face today resemble a different kind of war, one that jeopardises our future without the use of weapons. We cannot afford to let the sacrifices of past generations be in vain; we must unite to secure a better tomorrow for all.
3rd November 2024
It ends with us.......
The assertion that ‘who controls money controls the world’ by Henry Kissinger highlights the immense power that financial influence wields over global affairs. However, one must recognise that despite this power, there is one fundamental aspect of existence that remains beyond anyone’s control: death. No amount of wealth can alter the inevitability of mortality, reminding us that life is ultimately unpredictable and that true power lies in how we navigate our existence for the benefits of all mankind rather than in the accumulation of riches.